Fixed-Term Employee? Your Gratuity Now Starts at 1 Year, Not 5
One year, not five. The second proviso to Section 53 of the Code on Social Security, 2020 removes the five-year continuous-service requirement where a fixed-term engagement expires, and Section 53(2) requires gratuity for fixed-term employees to be paid on a pro-rata basis.
Gratuity has long been understood in India as something you earn after five years. For fixed-term employees that is no longer the position, and a great many contracts still say otherwise.
Key takeaways
- Under the Code on Social Security, fixed-term employees qualify for gratuity after one year of service.
- The five-year threshold that most people know continues to apply in other situations.
- Contracts stating a flat five-year rule for fixed-term staff no longer reflect the position.
- The change makes the fixed-term versus permanent characterisation more consequential.
What changed
The Code on Social Security, 2020, in force since 21 November 2025, provides that fixed-term employees become eligible for gratuity after one year of service rather than the five years that applied under the previous regime. The Payment of Gratuity Act 1972, which most Indian employees know as the source of the five-year rule, was among the statutes subsumed by the Codes.
The reasoning behind the change is straightforward. Fixed-term employment by its nature often runs for less than five years, so a five-year threshold meant fixed-term staff structurally could not accrue a benefit that permanent staff could. Reducing the qualifying period for that category addresses the gap.
Why your contract probably still says five years
Employment templates in India commonly carry a line to the effect that gratuity is payable in accordance with the Payment of Gratuity Act on completion of five years of continuous service. That sentence was accurate for years, which is exactly why it is everywhere.
Applied to a fixed-term employee today it is not. This is one of the cleanest examples of a clause that is not simply old-fashioned but wrong on its face, and it is worth flagging whether you are issuing the contract or signing it.
Fixed-term versus permanent matters more now
The change raises the stakes on how an engagement is characterised. Fixed-term employment is a recognised category under the Industrial Relations Code, and it carries its own consequences around termination and benefits. An engagement labelled fixed-term but operating like permanent employment, or the reverse, was always worth examining; it is now worth examining for a further reason.
If you are on a series of renewed fixed-term contracts, the aggregate picture of your service is worth understanding rather than assuming each term resets everything. That analysis depends on the specific facts and is a good question for an advocate.
What to check
- Whether your contract characterises the engagement as fixed-term, and whether the description matches how you actually work.
- Whether any gratuity clause states a flat five-year rule without distinguishing fixed-term employment.
- Whether the contract refers to the Payment of Gratuity Act 1972 by name, which indicates it predates the Codes.
- For employers, whether payroll and provisioning reflect the one-year threshold for fixed-term staff.
Have a contract in front of you?
Upload it and get every clause checked against Indian law, with the provision each finding rests on.
Review your employment contractCommon questions
Does the five-year rule still exist at all?
The reduction to one year is specific to fixed-term employees. The longer qualifying period continues to apply in other situations. The practical point is that a contract applying a flat five-year rule to a fixed-term employee no longer reflects the position.
I have been on renewed one-year contracts for four years. Where do I stand?
That depends on how the renewals and your continuity of service are characterised, which is fact-specific. It is a well-worn area of dispute in Indian employment law and worth putting to a qualified advocate with your actual contracts in hand.
Related guides
This article is general information about Indian law as of 2026-07-26, not legal advice, and reading it does not create an advocate–client relationship. Statutes and rules change, particularly under the Labour Codes where State rules are still being notified. Consult a qualified advocate about your own situation.