Your Builder Pays Rs 5 Per Sq Ft For Delay. You Pay 18% Interest
Open almost any Indian builder-buyer agreement and compare two clauses: what you pay if an instalment is late, and what the builder pays if possession is late. The gap between them is the clearest single indicator of how the document was drafted.
Key takeaways
- Builder-buyer agreements routinely charge the buyer interest on late instalments at a substantial rate.
- The corresponding compensation for delayed possession is often a small amount per square foot per month.
- Section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 addresses failure to hand over possession by the agreed date.
- It contemplates either withdrawal with a refund and interest, or interest for every month of delay if the allottee stays.
- A token contractual penalty sits awkwardly against that statutory position.
The two clauses to compare
Find the clause dealing with delayed payment by you. It will usually specify interest at a stated rate per annum on any overdue instalment, frequently in the region of fifteen to twenty per cent, sometimes compounded.
Now find the clause dealing with delayed possession by the builder. It will often specify compensation at a fixed amount per square foot per month, which on a typical flat translates to a fraction of what you are paying in rent or EMI while you wait. The two are not comparable, and they were not drafted to be.
What Section 18 provides
Section 18 of RERA addresses the position where a promoter fails to complete or is unable to give possession of an apartment, plot or building in accordance with the terms of the agreement for sale, or by the date specified in it.
It contemplates two routes for the allottee. Where the allottee wishes to withdraw from the project, the section addresses return of the amount received with interest and compensation. Where the allottee does not intend to withdraw, it addresses payment of interest for every month of delay until handing over of possession. Which route suits a particular buyer is a commercial decision as much as a legal one.
Why the contractual clause still matters
A buyer reading Section 18 might reasonably ask why the agreement clause matters at all. In practice it matters for two reasons. First, it is what the builder will point to in correspondence, and most disputes are resolved by correspondence rather than by adjudication. Second, the agreement is where the possession date itself is defined, and a statutory remedy for missing a date depends on the date being clear.
That is why the possession date clause deserves as much attention as the penalty clause. A date expressed as a target, or subject to extension for a long list of circumstances, weakens the position before any question of remedy arises.
The clauses that erode the date
- Possession described as anticipated, expected or targeted rather than committed.
- A grace period of six or twelve months added on top before any liability arises.
- Force majeure drafted so broadly that ordinary construction and approval delays fall inside it.
- Extension permitted for delays in obtaining approvals, which are the promoter own responsibility to pursue.
- A requirement that the buyer be free of any default before claiming, which turns a single late instalment into a forfeiture of the remedy.
What to do
Before signing, ask for the possession date to be committed rather than indicative, for the grace period to be short or removed, and for the delay compensation to be expressed on the same basis as the interest you pay. Symmetry is a reasonable ask and the response tells you a great deal.
If you are already in a delayed project, the position depends on your agreement, the project registration status and how the delay arose. Complaints under the Act are made to the State authority, and that is the point at which advice from an advocate who does RERA work is worth considerably more than a general article.
Have a contract in front of you?
Upload it and get every clause checked against Indian law, with the provision each finding rests on.
Review your builder-buyer agreement contractCommon questions
My agreement says the builder pays a fixed amount per square foot for delay. Is that all I can claim?
The agreement records what the parties wrote. Section 18 of RERA addresses what an allottee is entitled to where possession is not given by the agreed date, and that statutory position exists alongside the contract. How the two interact in your situation depends on the facts and is worth taking to an advocate.
The builder says the delay was force majeure. Does that end it?
Force majeure clauses are often drafted very broadly in builder agreements, and whether a particular cause falls within one is a question of construction and evidence. A blanket assertion is not the same as establishing it.
Should I withdraw or stay and claim interest?
That is a financial decision as much as a legal one, turning on the current value of the property, how far the project has progressed, and what you would do with a refund. Section 18 contemplates both routes; which is better for you is worth modelling before choosing.
Related guides
This article is general information about Indian law as of 2026-07-26, not legal advice, and reading it does not create an advocate–client relationship. Statutes and rules change, particularly under the Labour Codes where State rules are still being notified. Consult a qualified advocate about your own situation.