India · Founder · 6 min read

Assigning IP to Your Company: The Formalities Most Founders Miss

Knowing your company needs an assignment is the easy part. Executing one that does what you think it does is where Indian startups come unstuck, because the Copyright Act sets requirements that short-form documents routinely fail to meet.

Key takeaways

  • Section 19(2) requires an assignment to identify the work and specify the rights assigned, the duration and the territorial extent.
  • Under Section 19(5), where no duration is specified, the assignment is deemed to be for five years.
  • Moral rights under Section 57 are not assignable whatever the document says.
  • Patentable subject matter is governed by the Patents Act separately from copyright.
  • A one-line statement that the company owns everything is not an assignment meeting these requirements.

What Section 19 requires

Section 19 of the Copyright Act, 1957 governs the mode of assignment. It requires assignment to be in writing signed by the assignor, and under sub-section (3) the assignment must specify the rights assigned, the duration of the assignment and the territorial extent.

Those three particulars are the ones that get omitted. A clause saying that all intellectual property created shall vest in the company names none of them. Whether such a clause achieves what was intended depends on its wording and the facts, but drafting it properly costs nothing extra and removes the argument entirely.

The five-year default

Sub-section (5) provides that where the assignment does not specify the period, it shall be deemed to be for five years from the date of assignment. This is the provision founders find most surprising, because it means a sweeping assignment with no stated term may not be the permanent transfer everyone assumed.

For a company relying on an assignment executed at incorporation, a five-year horizon is not academic. It is a good reason to state the duration explicitly, and the standard formulation is for the full term of copyright, throughout the world, rather than leaving it to a default nobody intended.

What cannot be assigned

Section 57 preserves the author moral rights, including the right to claim authorship of the work and to restrain distortion or mutilation that would be prejudicial to their honour or reputation. Those rights sit with the author independently of who owns the copyright, and a contract purporting to assign them does not change that.

In practice this rarely obstructs a startup, since the commercial rights are what a company needs. It matters more where a founder or contractor might later object to how the work is used or attributed, and it is worth knowing that a waiver of moral rights in your template is not doing what its drafter hoped.

Copyright is not the whole picture

Copyright covers the expression, which for a software company means the code, documentation, designs and content. Patentable inventions are governed by the Patents Act, 1970, which has its own provisions on who may apply, and trade marks and designs have their own assignment formalities.

For most early-stage companies copyright does the heavy lifting, but an assignment drafted only around copyright leaves gaps where there is genuinely patentable subject matter or a brand of value. Worth flagging to whoever drafts your documents rather than assuming one clause covers all of it.

What a workable assignment looks like

  • In writing, signed by the assignor, whether that is a founder, contractor or agency.
  • Specifying the rights assigned, expressed broadly but explicitly.
  • Specifying duration, normally the full term of copyright rather than silence.
  • Specifying territory, normally worldwide.
  • Identifying the work with enough particularity to be meaningful, including pre-incorporation work where relevant.
  • Executed after incorporation where the assignee is the company, since the company must exist to take the assignment.

Have a contract in front of you?

Upload it and get every clause checked against Indian law, with the provision each finding rests on.

Review your founder & startup contract

Common questions

Our employment agreements have an IP clause. Do we still need separate assignments?

For work genuinely made in the course of employment, the statutory default under Section 17(c) already favours the employer. Separate assignments matter most for founders pre-incorporation, contractors, agencies and interns, where that default does not apply.

Does the five-year rule mean our IP reverts after five years?

Section 19(5) addresses assignments that do not specify a period. Whether it applies to a particular document depends on how that document is drafted and whether the work fell under employment first ownership in any event. The practical response is to state the duration explicitly rather than test the default.

Related guides

This article is general information about Indian law as of 2026-07-26, not legal advice, and reading it does not create an advocate–client relationship. Statutes and rules change, particularly under the Labour Codes where State rules are still being notified. Consult a qualified advocate about your own situation.